Re: [PATCH] git stash: one bug and one feature request
- From
Brian Swetland <swetland@google.com>
- Date
- Jan 4, 2008, 19:36 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20080104193630.GA26843@bulgaria.corp.google.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <m3abnlo4xv.fsf@roke.D-201>
[Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>]
Show 13 quoted lines
> Pascal Obry <pascal@obry.net> writes: > > Brandon Casey a écrit : > > > > > > Not sure how often such a command would be used though, so > > > it may not be worth it. > > > > I've missed it many times. Especially in some scripts when I want to use > > the stash-stack to store current working tree and clear it before > > exiting. This is not possible today as all the stash-stack would be cleared. > > > > I agree that drop seems better. > > or "git stash delete"
Something like drop or delete would be nice.
I tried to "clear" a single stash once. Oops!
Is there a reason that git stash apply couldn't take a small integer as the argument (at least as an alternative) instead of stash@{0}, etc?
Brian