From: Brian Swetland <swetland@google.com>
Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2008 19:36:30 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH] git stash: one bug and one feature request
Message-ID: <20080104193630.GA26843@bulgaria.corp.google.com>
In-Reply-To: <m3abnlo4xv.fsf@roke.D-201>

[Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>]
> Pascal Obry <pascal@obry.net> writes:
> > Brandon Casey a écrit :
> > >
> > > Not sure how often such a command would be used though, so
> > > it may not be worth it.
> > 
> > I've missed it many times. Especially in some scripts when I want to use
> > the stash-stack to store current working tree and clear it before
> > exiting. This is not possible today as all the stash-stack would be cleared.
> > 
> > I agree that drop seems better.
> 
> or "git stash delete"

Something like drop or delete would be nice.

I tried to "clear" a single stash once. Oops!

Is there a reason that git stash apply couldn't take a small integer
as the argument (at least as an alternative) instead of stash@{0}, etc?

Brian