Re: [PATCH] Fix and improve t7004
- From
Mike Hommey <mh@glandium.org>
- Date
- Nov 16, 2007, 21:35 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20071116213538.GA30076@glandium.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <EC3B30DC-E81C-4ECA-BE7F-F237E1338603@lrde.epita.fr>
On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 10:31:15PM +0100, Benoit Sigoure wrote:
Show 22 quoted lines
> On Nov 16, 2007, at 10:11 PM, Mike Hommey wrote: > >> On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 10:04:57PM +0100, Benoit Sigoure wrote: >>> On Nov 16, 2007, at 9:28 PM, Mike Hommey wrote: >>>> test_expect_success \ >>>> 'message in editor has initial comment' ' >>>> GIT_EDITOR=cat git tag -a initial-comment > actual || true && >>>> - test $(sed -n "/^\(#\|\$\)/p" actual | wc -l) -gt 0 >>>> + ( read empty ; >>>> + [ "$empty" ] && exit 1 ; >>> >>> What is this meant to do? Did you mean [ -n "$empty" ] ? >> >> Replacing with [ -n "$empty" ] would not work properly, except if you >> replace the following ; with &&. Does that really make a readability >> difference ? > > I don't get it. As far as I understand, you're trying to check whether > $empty is indeed empty, right? So how is `[ "$empty" ]' meant to work? > [ -n "$empty" ] && exit 1 > > will exit 1 if empty isn't empty.
Sorry, I read '-z', not '-n'. [ "$empty" ] and [ -n "$empty" ] are the same thing.
Mike