Re: New features in gitk
On Sun, Oct 28, 2007 at 11:13:43PM +0000, Paul Mackerras wrote:
Show 11 quoted lines
> Pierre Habouzit writes:
>
> > As you seem to be the guy to ask for, I've a couple of requests wrt
> > gitk.
> >
> > * the diff window is quite bad with merge commits, the colorization is
> > rather poor, and the last version you just merged isn't especially
> > better.
>
> That's not a request, that's a grizzle. :) What would you like it to
> look like?
I believe that git show/diff has it right: lines with a + should be in
the "added" color, and lines with a '-' in the "removed" one. gitk only
take the first "column" of +/- into account or sth I find awkward at
best, and I often go to the console to see a merge commit because of
that.
Show 8 quoted lines
> > * the 'sha1' input field is a major pain in the UI: the cut&paste
> > interaction is very poor. I don't know why, but it's often very very
> > hard to really copy the sha id, probably because it's selected by
> > default.
>
> It's selected so that the contents are in the cut buffer and you can
> paste them in an xterm with middle-button. Possibly I need to check
> that control-C (or command-C under macos) is properly bound to copy.
Well, doing ^C doesn't always copy it (probably a glitch wrt which
input has the focus), and it certainly doesn't synchronize with the cut
buffer for me. And it doesn't work for anyone at work either. I use ion
with the KDE clipboard manager (klipper -- because I never managed to
find a clipboard manager that is as good yet, not depending upon KDE),
and at work most people use KDE, with the same klipper. Maybe it's a bad
interaction, I should try to use it under gnome or so to see if it is.
Show 8 quoted lines
> > * the fact that it remembers the position where it was in the WM when
> > it was closed is really annoying. the WM is supposed to place the
> > window. With at least ion3 and xinerama it often shows up on the
> > wrong screen. Remembering the window size though is fine.
>
> That came in with some changes that make gitk start up correctly under
> windows. I could see about making it set the window position only
> under windows.
Show 8 quoted lines
> > * still wrt the layout, the focus is quite cumbersome. Gitk would be
> > really really really nice to be used only from the keyboard, but
> > because of a very unclear focus policy, it really isn't for me.
> > Maybe it's just me, and I know this may not be 100% helpful, but I
> > never know which part of gitk will receive my keys (history part,
> > diff part, tree, ...).
>
> What focus policy would you like?
Well, what would make sense (to _me_ at least) would be some shortcuts
to move to the history panel (say e.g. using F1), or to the diff view
(using e.g. F2), or in the file list (say F3).
That would hilight with a black 1px line (like it does for other
inputs fields) to say that this is the primary window part that takes
the keyboard inputs atm. And when doing that, if you press 'down' or
'up' it would scroll the adequate panel. It's really confusing that the
keyboard (or hjkl) right now always make the history change.
This way you can make the difference between the keyboard shortcuts
that apply to the focused part of the window (up/down, pgup/pgdown are
IMHO of that kind), and the one that the user (or the default gitk) has
associated to a specific part, no matter if it has the focus. E.g. J/K
(or for emacsish people ^N/^P) could always move the history, that would
make sense.
Cheers,
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··O madcoder@debian.org
OOO http://www.madism.org
Pierre Habouzit <madcoder@debian.org>