Re: repo.or.cz wishes?
- From
Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>
- Date
- Aug 27, 2007, 23:16 UTC
- Message-ID
- <200708280116.00537.jnareb@gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <alpine.LFD.0.999.0708271509230.25853@woody.linux-foundation.org>
Linus Torvalds wrote:
Show 7 quoted lines
> As to your TLS example: if we were to do "git over TLS", it would make > perfect sense to use either "tls://" (although "gits://" might be more > natural, not because tls is wrong, but because people have gotten used to > "https://") if we were to have a "secure git" port. Or maybe we'd use the > same port number that we already have assigned for git, and just add some > "use TLS to authenticate/encrypt", and use "tls://" for that. It makes > perfect sense.
I like gits:// idea for "git over TLS", and I'm against "tls://". I wonder if it would be hard to implement "git overt TLS"? We could resurrect patch which allowed push over git protocol, onnly restricting pushing to gits protocol.
-- Jakub Narebski Poland