From: Jakub Narebski Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 23:16:00 GMT Subject: Re: repo.or.cz wishes? Message-ID: <200708280116.00537.jnareb@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Linus Torvalds wrote: > As to your TLS example: if we were to do "git over TLS", it would make > perfect sense to use either "tls://" (although "gits://" might be more > natural, not because tls is wrong, but because people have gotten used to > "https://") if we were to have a "secure git" port. Or maybe we'd use the > same port number that we already have assigned for git, and just add some > "use TLS to authenticate/encrypt", and use "tls://" for that. It makes > perfect sense. I like gits:// idea for "git over TLS", and I'm against "tls://". I wonder if it would be hard to implement "git overt TLS"? We could resurrect patch which allowed push over git protocol, onnly restricting pushing to gits protocol. -- Jakub Narebski Poland