Re: repo.or.cz wishes?

From: Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>
Date: Aug 27, 2007, 21:58 UTC
Message-ID: <200708272358.43021.jnareb@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20070827004153.GN1219@pasky.or.cz>

On Monday, 27 August 2007, Petr "Pasky" Baudis wrote:

Show 5 quoted lines

> On Mon, Aug 27, 2007 at 02:16:34AM CEST, Sven Verdoolaege wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 27, 2007 at 01:59:44AM +0200, Petr Baudis wrote:
>>>
>>>   So now I wonder, what is the thing you miss most there? Any cool stuff
>>> repo.or.cz could (preferrably easily) do and doesn't?

Is it now possible to _upload_ SSH key, instad of copy'n'paste it when creating repository/account?

Would it be reasonable to limit repository name length, or at least modify gitweb to truncate (cut) it if it is too long?

Show 10 quoted lines

>> Just a minor nit, but how about dropping the "git+" from the
>> Push URL?
> 
> I'm a major proponent of the "git+" - it's just the correct thing to
> specify. ssh:// by itself means secure _shell_, and that's not what the
> URL means - ssh is literaily just a transport layer for the git
> protocol. This is not my invention but fairly standard thing which
> plenty of people use, and it makes it possible to select proper protocol
> handlers and so on, shall something generic crunch on the URL. I've
> never actually understood why do some people dislike it.

First, it is in the context of git, so one can say that "git+" is implied. Documentation mentions only "ssh://". That said I prefer "git+ssh://" to "ssh://" alone.

Second, IIRC Linus prefers scp-like syntax for SSH protocol, namely "[user]@host:/path/to/repo", so perhaps that one should be used instead.

Show 8 quoted lines

>> Jakub was also talking about support in gitweb for specifying
>> the location of submodules.  It would be nice if admins could
>> set this information, wherever it ends up getting stored.
> 
> Hmm, this shouldn't be very hard to do if the support will get into
> gitweb. And adding the support to gitweb shouldn't be that hard either.
> :-) OTOH, it's not something that would get me terribly excited, so I
> guess I'll wait for the gitweb side.

The problem is that repo.or.cz needs support for that in gitweb, while gitweb in turn needs support for that in git. This needs git consensus on how to specify object database location (or just gitdir) for submodules, to have later submodule support in gitweb.

-- 
Jakub Narebski
Poland