Re: [RFC/PATCH 2/2] gitweb: Add an option to show size of blobs in the tree view
- From
Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>
- Date
- Aug 1, 2007, 23:58 UTC
- Message-ID
- <200708020158.50343.jnareb@gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <7v3az24zo6.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 17 quoted lines
> Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com> writes: > >> But I agree that this should be protected by the %feature mechanism. >> Two questions: >> >> 1. Should we make '-l' default when turned on? Or make 'showsizes' >> %feature tristate: off, on, by default on? >> >> 2. If it is turned off, should we silently (or not so silently) >> ignore this option, or return "Permission denied" or perhaps >> "Invalid extra options parameter"? >> >> And how we should name this feature (key in %feature hash)? > > I would say we would not do this by default, only with an > explicit override with gitweb-config.perl. I am not sure what > the good name would be. "expensive-ls-tree" perhaps?
So you think that ";opt=-l" would be required to have 'tree' view with blob (file) sizes, and it would be allowed only if gitweb_check_feature('ls-tree-size') is true (or something like that). Should we return "Permission denied" or simply ignore "-l" extra option if it is prohivited by the config?
As to good name: 'showsize'? 'ls-tree-size'? 'ls-tree--long'?
Show 5 quoted lines
>> P.S. I have received no comments on >> [RFC/PATCH] gitweb: Enable transparent compression for HTTP output >> (trade CPU load for lower bandwidth usage). > > That's probably nobody was interested in it.
Well, it was also posted in the middle of old thread...
-- Jakub Narebski Poland