Re: MinGW port usable
- From
Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
- Date
- Jan 30, 2007, 15:18 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20070130151803.GA25779@spearce.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <Pine.LNX.4.63.0701301524360.22628@wbgn013.biozentrum.uni-wuerzburg.de>
Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> wrote:
Show 5 quoted lines
> On the git repository, using MinGW: > Using cygwin: > > IOW MinGW wins hands down with an average 0.33s vs cygwin with an average > 0.75s. (I am fairly certain that you must not trust sys times.)
Just curious, but were these tests run with mmap(), or NO_MMAP?
Clearly, for a packed repository most of the overhead should be in getting to the pack data itself (as everything else is pure userspace).
-- Shawn.