From: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 15:18:03 GMT
Subject: Re: MinGW port usable
Message-ID: <20070130151803.GA25779@spearce.org>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.63.0701301524360.22628@wbgn013.biozentrum.uni-wuerzburg.de>

Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> wrote:
> On the git repository, using MinGW:
> Using cygwin:
> 
> IOW MinGW wins hands down with an average 0.33s vs cygwin with an average 
> 0.75s. (I am fairly certain that you must not trust sys times.)

Just curious, but were these tests run with mmap(), or NO_MMAP?

Clearly, for a packed repository most of the overhead should be
in getting to the pack data itself (as everything else is pure
userspace).

-- 
Shawn.