From: Yann Dirson <ydirson@altern.org>
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 20:53:01 GMT
Subject: Re: Rebasing stgit stacks
Message-ID: <20070117205301.GH9761@nan92-1-81-57-214-146.fbx.proxad.net>
In-Reply-To: <eojn5c$v9u$1@sea.gmane.org>

On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 12:30:18AM +0100, Jakub Narebski wrote:
> I'm all for calling this command "stg rebase".

After all, my current implementation as "pull --to" mostly bypasses
the fetch, so it probably makes sense to use a new command.

However, "stg rebase <target>" does not sound right.  I'm not very
happy with "stg rebaseto <target>" (or rebase-to) either.
"stg rebase --to <target>" may feel strange too (command without
non-option arg), but may finally a good choice after all ?  What do
others think ?

Best regards,
-- 
Yann.