Re: [PATCH] Trim hint printed when gecos is empty.
- From
- Andy Parkins <andyparkins@gmail.com>
- Date
- Nov 28, 2006, 14:03 UTC
- Message-ID
- <200611281403.36370.andyparkins@gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <Pine.LNX.4.63.0611281426311.30004@wbgn013.biozentrum.uni-wuerzburg.de>
On Tuesday 2006 November 28 13:28, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> No. As has been often said, a signoff _has_ to be a conscious act, or else > it will lose its meaning.
I'm not suggesting that a project integrator would have that switch on, but for me, in my own repository, where I am the only person writing patches, what possible case is there that I won't sign off?
> Once you are reasonably convinced you want to sign off on that commit,
I am always convinced. Perhaps I am doing wrong - please explain to me under what circumstance I would /not/ want to sign off on a commit. (assuming I am acting merely as a developer on a project, I am not accepting patches from anyone but me).
> just add "-s" to git-commit. And if you forgot, fix it by "git commit -s > --amend". (Note that this is another nice example why "-a" by default > would be wrong, wrong, wrong.)
I don't see what one has to do with the other. There are good arguments for not having "-a" default, but signing off isn't one of them.
Andy
-- Dr Andy Parkins, M Eng (hons), MIEE