Re: What's in git.git
- From
Petr Baudis <pasky@suse.cz>
- Date
- Sep 11, 2006, 22:14 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20060911221411.GG23891@pasky.or.cz>
- In-Reply-To
- <ee4j3j$mli$1@sea.gmane.org>
Dear diary, on Mon, Sep 11, 2006 at 11:06:03PM CEST, I got a letter where Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com> said that...
Show 14 quoted lines
> Junio C Hamano wrote: > > >> * git-rev-list: --stdin to feed list of <commits>; it is not clear from > >> the manpage if one can use ^<commit>, and commit related options > >> and shortcuts like --not, <commit>..<commit>, <commit>...<commit> > >> * git-pack-objects: --revs to provide arguments to rev-list from stdin, > >> instead of list of objects. UNDOCUMENTED. > > > > Time spent whining about it is better spent finding it out > > yourself (UTSL) and writing it I suspect. You'll learn how > > things actually work while doing so ;-). > > I still think it is better, easier and faster for someone who makes a new > feature to document it too.
Especially since we _DON'T_ have good track record in other people quickly documenting newly introduced undocumented features.
-- Petr "Pasky" Baudis Stuff: http://pasky.or.cz/ Snow falling on Perl. White noise covering line noise. Hides all the bugs too. -- J. Putnam