Re: What's in git.git
- From
Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
- Date
- Sep 18, 2006, 08:11 UTC
- Message-ID
- <Pine.LNX.4.63.0609181010500.19042@wbgn013.biozentrum.uni-wuerzburg.de>
- In-Reply-To
- <eeld1a$830$2@sea.gmane.org>
Hi,
On Mon, 18 Sep 2006, Jakub Narebski wrote:
Show 24 quoted lines
> Junio C Hamano wrote: > > > Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com> writes: > > > >> Junio C Hamano wrote: > >> > >>> - An experimental git-for-each-ref command to help language > >>> bindings to get information on many refs at once. Hopefully > >>> Jakub can teach gitweb to use it to speed things up. > >> > >> I use 'origin' (or 'next') version of gitweb, while using _released_ > >> version of git (git-core-1.4.2.1-1.i386.rpm). So at least for now > >> I wouldn't be able to _test_ the git-for-each-ref. > > > > That's not a good excuse, though. It means you cannot propose > > new core-side support that only gitweb would benefit from > > initially, since we will not add new stuff to the core that does > > not have real users, and new stuff in the core must be cooked in > > "next" before it is proven to be useful and correct. > > But this also means that if I were for example to use git-for-each-ref > in gitweb, I couldn't _test_ if it works. Ah, well, if you can live with > PATCH/RFC... But I'd rather wait for git-for-each-ref in _released_ version > of git.
Why not set up a testing directory, where you use both gitweb _and_ git from next? It is easy...
Ciao, Dscho