From: Petr Baudis <pasky@suse.cz>
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 22:14:12 GMT
Subject: Re: What's in git.git
Message-ID: <20060911221411.GG23891@pasky.or.cz>
In-Reply-To: <ee4j3j$mli$1@sea.gmane.org>

Dear diary, on Mon, Sep 11, 2006 at 11:06:03PM CEST, I got a letter
where Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com> said that...
> Junio C Hamano wrote:
> 
> >>  * git-rev-list: --stdin to feed list of <commits>; it is not clear from 
> >>    the manpage if one can use ^<commit>, and commit related options
> >>    and shortcuts like --not, <commit>..<commit>, <commit>...<commit>
> >>  * git-pack-objects: --revs to provide arguments to rev-list from stdin,
> >>    instead of list of objects. UNDOCUMENTED.
> > 
> > Time spent whining about it is better spent finding it out
> > yourself (UTSL) and writing it I suspect.  You'll learn how
> > things actually work while doing so ;-).
> 
> I still think it is better, easier and faster for someone who makes a new
> feature to document it too.

Especially since we _DON'T_ have good track record in other people
quickly documenting newly introduced undocumented features.

-- 
				Petr "Pasky" Baudis
Stuff: http://pasky.or.cz/
Snow falling on Perl. White noise covering line noise.
Hides all the bugs too. -- J. Putnam