Re: Gitk strangeness..
- From
Alex Riesen <raa.lkml@gmail.com>
- Date
- Mar 30, 2006, 20:57 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20060330205759.GA27131@steel.home>
- In-Reply-To
- <17449.48630.370867.10251@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com>
Paul Mackerras, Wed, Mar 29, 2006 00:51:34 +0200:
Show 8 quoted lines
> Junio C Hamano writes: > > > How about this alternative patch, then? It turned out to be > > quite convoluted as I feared. > > That's brilliant. Thank you! With the patch to gitk below, the > graph display on Linus' example looks much saner. >
Well... Could you take a look at these screenshots, please? http://home.arcor.de/fork0/bug/gitk1.jpg (this one is BIG, 400k, 2456x949) http://home.arcor.de/fork0/bug/gitk2.jpg http://home.arcor.de/fork0/bug/gitk3.jpg
The compressed repository is being uploaded there:
http://home.arcor.de/fork0/bug/ggg.tar.bz2 (~6Mb)
The old gitk produced a denser graph, which wasn't perfect too, but had a higher count of visible commit titles (and this is two-monitor setup, too).