Re: [PATCH] Reintroduce svn pools to solve the memory leak.
- From
Karl Hasselström <kha@treskal.com>
- Date
- Mar 28, 2006, 12:20 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20060328122031.GA14124@diana.vm.bytemark.co.uk>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vhd5joiqt.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
On 2006-03-27 10:16:58 -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Karl, were there other reasons you needed to disable the pool here > (maybe to work around a problem with incompatible version of SVN > module)? I see some other uses of SVN::Pool still there in the code, > so I am assuming this was a simple typo, but just in case...
No, it's just a simple mistake (the mistake being me not realizing why an explicit pool was needed, and simply dropping it when things worked fine without it).
--
Karl Hasselström, kha@treskal.com
www.treskal.com/kalle