From: Karl Hasselström <kha@treskal.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2006 12:20:31 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Reintroduce svn pools to solve the memory leak.
Message-ID: <20060328122031.GA14124@diana.vm.bytemark.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <7vhd5joiqt.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>

On 2006-03-27 10:16:58 -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> Karl, were there other reasons you needed to disable the pool here
> (maybe to work around a problem with incompatible version of SVN
> module)? I see some other uses of SVN::Pool still there in the code,
> so I am assuming this was a simple typo, but just in case...

No, it's just a simple mistake (the mistake being me not realizing why
an explicit pool was needed, and simply dropping it when things worked
fine without it).

-- 
Karl Hasselström, kha@treskal.com
      www.treskal.com/kalle