Re: [PATCH 1/3] Support for SSL client cert
- From
- Nick Hengeveld <nickh@reactrix.com>
- Date
- Sep 27, 2005, 00:15 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20050927001542.GC15615@reactrix.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <7v3bnrh85g.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 01:43:39PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> That is a valid concern. > > Anoter possibility is to read them from the environment, since > we already do SSL_NO_VERIFY from there.
Good point - use of environment variables is more consistent. Use of command-line arguments is a bit more convenient in my case since I'm driving the transfer from a perl script, but I suppose consistency is more important...
-- For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for nature cannot be fooled.