From: Nick Hengeveld Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 00:15:42 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] Support for SSL client cert Message-ID: <20050927001542.GC15615@reactrix.com> In-Reply-To: <7v3bnrh85g.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 01:43:39PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > That is a valid concern. > > Anoter possibility is to read them from the environment, since > we already do SSL_NO_VERIFY from there. Good point - use of environment variables is more consistent. Use of command-line arguments is a bit more convenient in my case since I'm driving the transfer from a perl script, but I suppose consistency is more important... -- For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for nature cannot be fooled.