Re: [ANNOUNCE] Cogito-0.12

From: Petr Baudis <pasky@suse.cz>
Date: Jul 8, 2005, 08:14 UTC
Message-ID: <20050708081458.GA17022@pasky.ji.cz>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0507071706090.25104@g5.osdl.org>

Dear diary, on Fri, Jul 08, 2005 at 02:09:48AM CEST, I got a letter where Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org> told me that...

Show 13 quoted lines

> 
> 
> On Thu, 7 Jul 2005, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > > 
> > > cg-update from a local repo that contains packs is broken though :-(
> > 
> > Is this with cg-0.12? The most recent release should be happy with packs.
> 
> Ahh, I see it. It's because it uses "git-local-pull", and yes, 
> git-local-pull does the old filename assumption. Right?
> 
> Ho humm.. That's a bug in local-pull.c, although I'm not sure how to fix
> it best.

It seems like the whole pull family is totally borked now, and I'm getting desperate. Looks like this evening will be *pull.c fixing for me.

Jul 04 Daniel Barkalow  [PATCH 0/2] Support for transferring pack files in git-ssh-*

is what brings some hope to my life, though. Daniel? Any chance we could get the similar fixes for local-pull? (I didn't actually look at the patch but briefly.) I'll try to review the ssh patchset ASAP - I still prefer it much to the fetch-pack things since its protocol is actually extensible.

> The _simplest_ fix is to use git-fetch-pack. It doesn't give you the 
> convenient hard-linking, though.

Hard-linking is an absolute must for local repositories (well, either that for people who want safety, or symlinking for the rest who want speed - I want to make that one possible in Cogito ASAP but it requires some non-trivial changes to some of its assumptions).

-- 
				Petr "Pasky" Baudis
Stuff: http://pasky.or.cz/
<Espy> be careful, some twit might quote you out of context..