Re: [PATCH] Use correct U*MAX.
- From
Petr Baudis <pasky@ucw.cz>
- Date
- Jun 4, 2005, 00:00 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20050604000042.GG13093@pasky.ji.cz>
- In-Reply-To
- <7v4qcfko0q.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
Dear diary, on Sat, Jun 04, 2005 at 01:40:21AM CEST, I got a letter where Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> told me that...
> I'd rather see it use the correct U*MAX.
Care to elaborate? It doesn't make sense to me to use any U*MAX stuff there whatsoever. (And how do you define the "correct" U*MAX anyway?)
P.S.: Could you please always keep at least some context in the mail? Thanks.
-- Petr "Pasky" Baudis Stuff: http://pasky.or.cz/ C++: an octopus made by nailing extra legs onto a dog. -- Steve Taylor