Re: I'm missing isofs.h

From: Petr Baudis <pasky@ucw.cz>
Date: Apr 28, 2005, 07:52 UTC
Message-ID: <20050428075244.GE8612@pasky.ji.cz>
In-Reply-To: <7vhdhra2sg.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>

Dear diary, on Thu, Apr 28, 2005 at 07:27:59AM CEST, I got a letter where Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> told me that...

Show 10 quoted lines

> PB> Actually, I can't; the patch generator is not on par with mine yet.
> PB> It does not show modes and does not indicate file adds/removals by
> PB> /dev/null - basically, I need something cg-patch can eat (and it should
> PB> be backwards compatible). I think throwing the sha1 hashes away will not
> PB> harm; I got used to the Index: field and === marker, but I don't care if
> PB> I loose it.
> 
> I've looked at what cg-Xdiffdo does.  From the above paragraph,
> I sense that it does more than what cg-patch requires, so I took
> a look at cg-patch, too.

Yes; that was what the last sentence was about. ;-)

Show 5 quoted lines

> Can you help me verify if I understand the requirements cg-patch
> has on its input correctly?
> 
>  - Follow the convention of showing newly added files with
>    "--- /dev/null" and removed files with "+++ /dev/null";

Yes.

Show 5 quoted lines

>  - Label matches this Perl regexp:
> 
>      m|^(---|\+\+\+)\s+[^/]+\/(\S+)\s+.*mode:([0-7]{3,}).*/|
> 
>    and you only care about sign ($1), filename ($2) and mode ($3).

Yes..

Show 15 quoted lines

>  (modified files)
>  --- a/fs/ext3/Makefile  (mode:0644)
>  +++ b/fs/ext3/Makefile  (mode:0664)
> 
>  (deleted files)
>  --- a/fs/ext3/Makefile  (mode:0644)
>  +++ /dev/null
> 
>  (added files)
>  --- /dev/null
>  +++ b/fs/ext3/Makefile  (mode:0644)
> 
> Is my understanding correct?  If so it should not be too much
> work to generate something like it from within the builtin
> stuff.

Yes, perfectly.

> Provided if that is what the kernel folks can live with (I do
> see why the tool wants the mode bits, but it is unusual to see
> non-timestamp strings after filenames).

There's no reason not to get the timestamps too if you can; just put them after the attributes. They aren't in the diff now either.

I need the mode bits to set the mode right, surprisingly. :-) Yes, in part it is a leftover from the old times when we didn't just track the execute bit; I don't know if it is worth changing this.

-- 
				Petr "Pasky" Baudis
Stuff: http://pasky.or.cz/
C++: an octopus made by nailing extra legs onto a dog. -- Steve Taylor