Re: I'm missing isofs.h

From: Jan Harkes <jaharkes@cs.cmu.edu>
Date: Apr 27, 2005, 16:43 UTC
Message-ID: <20050427164351.GA7070@delft.aura.cs.cmu.edu>
In-Reply-To: <20050427135840.GE3014@pasky.ji.cz>

On Wed, Apr 27, 2005 at 03:58:41PM +0200, Petr Baudis wrote:

Show 10 quoted lines

> Dear diary, on Wed, Apr 27, 2005 at 02:58:44PM CEST, I got a letter
> where Jan Harkes <jaharkes@cs.cmu.edu> told me that...
> > On Tue, Apr 26, 2005 at 09:43:38PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > In a current tree, using git-pasky-0.7:
> > 
> > It looks like git-pasky-0.7 doesn't include the following commit, but
> > there are also several other diff and merge related fixes that were
> > added since then.
> 
> Why do you think it doesn't include it? I can see the fix in the code.

I looked through the output of cg-log, which I thought had at least some ordering, and that commit showed up as more recent than the pasky-0.7 entry. It looks like the same change is also part of pasky-0.7, but with a different commit-id. Sorry about the confusion.

In any case, when I use
    cg-diff -r a2755a80f40e5794ddc20e00f781af9d6320fafb: | grep isofs.h

the missing file does show up,
    ...
    Index: fs/isofs/isofs.h
    +++ fd1621a8c03331bd78abfe52c8c385977d0a9729/fs/isofs/isofs.h (mode:100644 sha1:9ce7b51fb6141ea6b82d85687d490c74755591fb)
    ...

so either I'm missing some subtle command line error (missing ':' after the tag-id?) or the problem was fixed by some other change. So I looked through the logs to see if there was anything obvious and the commit I mentioned looked promising.

Jan