Re: [PATCH v2] rebase -i: add config to abbreviate command-names

> Hi Andreas,
> 
> On Tue, 25 Apr 2017, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> 
> > On Apr 25 2017, Liam Beguin <liambeguin@gmail.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > diff --git a/Documentation/config.txt b/Documentation/config.txt
> > > index 475e874d5155..8b1877f2df91 100644
> > > --- a/Documentation/config.txt
> > > +++ b/Documentation/config.txt
> > > @@ -2614,6 +2614,25 @@ rebase.instructionFormat::
> > >  	the instruction list during an interactive rebase.  The format will automatically
> > >  	have the long commit hash prepended to the format.
> > >  
> > > +rebase.abbrevCmd::
> > > +	If set to true, `git rebase -i` will abbreviate the command-names in the
> > > +	instruction list. This means that instead of looking like this,
> > > +
> > > +-------------------------------------------
> > > +	pick deadbee The oneline of this commit
> > > +	pick fa1afe1 The oneline of the next commit
> > > +	...
> > > +-------------------------------------------
> > > +
> > > +	the list would use the short version of the command resulting in
> > > +	something like this.
> > > +
> > > +-------------------------------------------
> > > +	p deadbee The oneline of this commit
> > > +	p fa1afe1 The oneline of the next commit
> > > +	...
> > > +-------------------------------------------
> > 
> > That doesn't explain the point of the option.
> 
> And what you forgot to say in order to make this a constructive criticism
> is: we probably want to add a sentence like this:
> 
> 
> 	Using the one-letter abbreviations will align the lines better
> 	in case that the non-abbreviated commands have different lengths.
> 
> Speaking of commands with different lengths, I just thought of fixup and
> squash. I do not think those are handled by the patch, but they should be
> (the `action` in the first loop of `rearrange_squash` should abbreviate
> via `test p != "$pickcmd" || action=${action%${action#?}}`).
>