[PATCH 1/3] Correct test-parse-options to handle negative ints
- From
Charles Bailey <charles@hashpling.org>
- Date
- Jun 19, 2015, 09:10 UTC
- Message-ID
- <1434705059-2793-2-git-send-email-charles@hashpling.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <1434705059-2793-1-git-send-email-charles@hashpling.org>
From: Charles Bailey <cbailey32@bloomberg.net>
Fix the printf specification to treat 'integer' as the signed type that it is and add a test that checks that we parse negative option arguments.
Signed-off-by: Charles Bailey <cbailey32@bloomberg.net> --- t/t0040-parse-options.sh | 2 ++ test-parse-options.c | 2 +- 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/t/t0040-parse-options.sh b/t/t0040-parse-options.sh index b044785..ecb7417 100755 --- a/t/t0040-parse-options.sh +++ b/t/t0040-parse-options.sh @@ -151,6 +151,8 @@ test_expect_success 'short options' ' test_must_be_empty output.err ' +test_expect_success 'OPT_INT() negative' 'check integer: -2345 -i -2345' + cat > expect << EOF boolean: 2 integer: 1729 diff --git a/test-parse-options.c b/test-parse-options.c index 5dabce6..7c492cf 100644 --- a/test-parse-options.c +++ b/test-parse-options.c @@ -82,7 +82,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv) argc = parse_options(argc, (const char **)argv, prefix, options, usage, 0); printf("boolean: %d\n", boolean); - printf("integer: %u\n", integer); + printf("integer: %d\n", integer); printf("timestamp: %lu\n", timestamp); printf("string: %s\n", string ? string : "(not set)"); printf("abbrev: %d\n", abbrev);
-- 2.4.0.53.g8440f74