Re: [PATCH v2] add-patch: enforce only one-letter response to prompts
- From
- Dragan Simic <dsimic@manjaro.org>
- Date
- May 22, 2024, 19:03 UTC
- Message-ID
- <11abab810253d654119fab69adf44fab@manjaro.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <xmqqzfsh6cjf.fsf@gitster.g>
On 2024-05-22 18:23, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 9 quoted lines
> Dragan Simic <dsimic@manjaro.org> writes: >> On 2024-05-22 01:20, Junio C Hamano wrote: >>> single-char mode, we may see 'qa' as a response to a prompt >> >> Perhaps s/single-char/single-character/ > > I shouldn't have been loose in the language. Rather, we should say > "single key mode", as the knob to control the feature is the > "interactive.singlekey" variable.
Yes, "single-key mode" is better; "when interactive.singlekey is not enabled" may be even a bit better. Not worth a reroll, of course.
Show 14 quoted lines
>>> + /* 'g' takes a hunk number, '/' takes a regexp */
>>> + if (1 < s->answer.len && (ch != 'g' && ch != '/')) {
>>
>> To me, "s->answer.len > 1" would be much more readable, and
>> I was surprised a bit to see the flipped variant. This made
>> me curious; would you, please, let me know why do you prefer
>> this form?
>
> "textual order should reflect actual order" (read CodingGuidelines).
>
> For more backstory,
>
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/git/?q=%22textual+order%22+%22actual+order%22That's exactly what I assumed, but frankly, in this particular case I really can't force myself, despite trying quite hard, into liking it. It's simply strange to me.