Re: git-rev-list in local commit order
- From
- Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
- Date
- May 15, 2005, 21:30 UTC
- Message-ID
- <1116192629.11872.201.camel@tglx>
- In-Reply-To
- <1273.10.10.10.24.1116192097.squirrel@linux1>
On Sun, 2005-05-15 at 17:21 -0400, Sean wrote:
Show 5 quoted lines
> > Time is illusion. > > What you're missing is that time is only important in this case to deduce > the relative age of each commit LOCALLY. The intention of this proposal > is not to allow time comparison of commits between repositories.
I do not want to compare times. I want to figure out workflows and histories between different repositories.
> In fact, > you'll see if you look closely, that you don't need to do that in order to > solve the stated problem of sorting the commits by the time they were > merged LOCALLY.
Even LOCALLY is no guarantee for correct timestamps.
tglx