Re: git-rev-list in local commit order

From: Sean <seanlkml@sympatico.ca>
Date: May 15, 2005, 20:45 UTC
Message-ID: <1102.10.10.10.24.1116189916.squirrel@linux1>
In-Reply-To: <1116189873.11872.171.camel@tglx>

On Sun, May 15, 2005 4:44 pm, Thomas Gleixner said:

Show 19 quoted lines

> On Sun, 2005-05-15 at 15:57 -0400, Sean wrote:
>> Afterall, most people using git are getting by
>> just fine without such a facility today.
>
> Axiom 1:
> Sean knows exactly what people care about
>
> Axiom 2:
> Time is a reliable source of information.
>
> Axiom 3:
> All information except X can be derived from time.
>
> Axiom 4:
> Most people dont care about X, therefor X is irrelevant.
>
> Axiom 5:
> If doubts, see Axiom 1
>

Thomas,

You can continue the personal attacks or you can simply explain to the list what you are trying to accomplish and why it is important and why any other proposal besides yours isn't worthy.

Sean