Re: History messup
On Mon, 2005-05-09 at 18:27 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-05-09 at 16:59 +0000, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> It's normal practice, and it _has_ to be the case. Otherwise the trees
> would never stabilise -- every time Linus pulled from my tree he would
> create a merge-commit which I don't yet have, and vice versa.
> Unless a commit also carries a unique repo-id identifying the repository
> in which it originally occurred, you'll only ever be able to track
> history in the way people want by means of heuristics.
That would be really great. A line after "parents" like
repoid "username/reponame"
would be sufficient
tglx