From: Thomas Gleixner Date: Mon, 09 May 2005 17:48:23 GMT Subject: Re: History messup Message-ID: <1115660903.19236.39.camel@tglx> In-Reply-To: <1115659677.16187.393.camel@hades.cambridge.redhat.com> On Mon, 2005-05-09 at 18:27 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: > On Mon, 2005-05-09 at 16:59 +0000, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > It's normal practice, and it _has_ to be the case. Otherwise the trees > would never stabilise -- every time Linus pulled from my tree he would > create a merge-commit which I don't yet have, and vice versa. Sure > Unless a commit also carries a unique repo-id identifying the repository > in which it originally occurred, you'll only ever be able to track > history in the way people want by means of heuristics. That would be really great. A line after "parents" like repoid "username/reponame" would be sufficient tglx