Re: History messup
- From
- H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
- Date
- May 9, 2005, 19:34 UTC
- Message-ID
- <427FBB53.1000801@zytor.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <1115665598.12012.422.camel@baythorne.infradead.org>
David Woodhouse wrote:
Show 7 quoted lines
> > Of course it isn't. But neither is the meaning "a committer" or > "an author" or even "a date". > > Including some kind of repo-specific identifier with each commit would > help us to make sense of the history, just as those other fields do. >
I'm particularly thinking of when you copy and clone directories, you have to define your semantics more specifically. When do you want to *copy* this ID, and when do you want to make sure a new one is created?
One possible answer to that is to have .git/repoid and have it auto-created (from /dev/urandom) if it doesn't exist, but I also observe that at least two people (davem and pavel) have managed to clone "Linus' kernel tree" as their description on http://www.kernel.org/git/ ...
-hpa