Re: [PATCH v4] add-patch: response to unknown command
- From
- phillip.wood123@gmail.com <phillip.wood123@gmail.com>
- Date
- Apr 25, 2024, 08:53 UTC
- Message-ID
- <02440375-2514-48a3-8f94-11d853f00caa@gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20240425014432.GA1768914@coredump.intra.peff.net>
Hi Peff
On 25/04/2024 02:44, Jeff King wrote:
Show 26 quoted lines
> On Sun, Apr 21, 2024 at 11:52:33PM +0200, Rubén Justo wrote:
>
>> +test_expect_success 'unknown command' '
>> + test_when_finished "git reset --hard; rm -f command" &&
>> + echo W >command &&
>> + git add -N command &&
>> + git diff command >expect &&
>> + cat >>expect <<-EOF &&
>> + (1/1) Stage addition [y,n,q,a,d,e,p,?]? Unknown command ${SQ}W${SQ} (use ${SQ}?${SQ} for help)
>> + (1/1) Stage addition [y,n,q,a,d,e,p,?]?$SP
>> + EOF
>> + git add -p -- command <command >actual 2>&1 &&
>> + test_cmp expect actual
>> +'
>
> I got a test failure on Windows CI from this. The test_cmp output looks
> like this:
>
> -(1/1) Stage addition [y,n,q,a,d,e,p,?]? Unknown command 'W' (use '?' for help)
> -(1/1) Stage addition [y,n,q,a,d,e,p,?]?
> +(1/1) Stage addition [y,n,q,a,d,e,p,?]? (1/1) Stage addition [y,n,q,a,d,e,p,?]?
> +Unknown command 'W' (use '?' for help)
>
> which makes me suspect a race. Perhaps because the prompt is going to
> stdout, but the "Unknown command" message goes to stderr? Maybe we
> should keep stdout and stderr separate and check them independently.Can we change err() to print to stdout? I can't really see the advantage of separating "normal output" and "error messages" for an interactive program like this.
Best Wishes
Phillip