RE: t0025 flakey?

From: Randall S. Becker <rsbecker@nexbridge.com>
Date: Feb 8, 2019, 10:21 UTC
Message-ID: <000901d4bf98$1ab08fe0$5011afa0$@nexbridge.com>
In-Reply-To: <20190207235726.GR10587@szeder.dev>

On February 7, 2019 18:57, SZEDER Gábor wrote:

Show 16 quoted lines

> On Thu, Feb 07, 2019 at 11:58:08AM -0500, Randall S. Becker wrote:
> > > The NonStop port has traditionally had issues with t0025, which we
> > > tended to ignore because things did work. We wrote those off as bash
> > > issues in
> > > t0025 since they seemed to be corrected when we picked up a new bash
> > > version about a year ago. I will keep monitoring this, particularly
> > > when
> > 2.21
> > > comes out.
> >
> > FYI: t0020-t0027 all passed on the NonStop port for 2.21.0-rc0 - so no
> > issues for us on this one.
> 
> Note that t0021 is very likely flaky on NonStop, too:
> 
>   https://public-inbox.org/git/20190111140408.GC840@szeder.dev/T/#u

We will keep a watch on it, thanks. t0021 has been stable on this platform for at least a year and passes for 2.21.0-rc0 as well as 2.20.0.

Cheers, Randall