patchdoc: git-bisect: change plural form to singular

Correct the usage in git-bisect documentation to use singular form for a repeatable argument as other commands do.

I reported this tiny issue previously but didn't see a response so I thought I'd use it as a chance to get up to speed on the patch submission process. Sorry if no response meant no interest on this issue.

Britton Leo Kerin (1):
  doc: use singular form of repeatable path arg

 Documentation/git-bisect.txt | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

base-commit: 055bb6e9969085777b7fab83e3fee0017654f134 -- 2.43.0

Britton Leo Kerin (2):
  doc: use singular form of repeatable path arg
  doc: refer to pathspec instead of path

 Documentation/git-bisect.txt | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Range-diff against v1:
1:  90c081dcab ! 1:  da40e4736b doc: use singular form of repeatable path arg
    @@ Commit message
         later document text mentions 'path' arguments, while it doesn't mention
         'paths'.

    -    Signed-off-by: Britton L Kerin <britton.kergin@gmail.com>
    +    Signed-off-by: Britton Leo Kerin <britton.kergin@gmail.com>

      ## Documentation/git-bisect.txt ##
     @@ Documentation/git-bisect.txt: The command takes various subcommands, and different options depending
-:  ---------- > 2:  d932b6d501 doc: refer to pathspec instead of path
--
2.43.0

On Tue, Jan 02, 2024 at 07:02:05PM -0900, Britton Leo Kerin wrote:

Hmm. The end-state of these two patches looks good to me, but I probably would have written this change as a single change from "paths" -> "pathspec", not "paths" -> "path" -> "pathspec".

Thanks, Taylor

Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com> writes:

Have we seen a resolution to this comment? I _think_ it is an OK approach to take to do this in two steps, if the use of technical term "pathspec" could be controversial, but since it is not, I am fine with either one or two patches. Since we already have the two-patch version, let's take it.

Thanks.

Signed-off-by: Britton Leo Kerin <britton.kerin@gmail.com>
---
 Documentation/git-bisect.txt | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

This is more correct because the <path>... doc syntax already indicates that the arg is "array-type". It's how other tools do it. Finally, the later document text mentions 'path' arguments, while it doesn't mention 'paths'.

Signed-off-by: Britton Leo Kerin <britton.kergin@gmail.com>
---
 Documentation/git-bisect.txt | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)