threads / patch / 47610

patchRemoved unnecessary void* from hashmap.h that caused compile warnings

Subject: [PATCH] Removed unnecessary void* from hashmap.h that caused compile warnings

## tl;dr

5 messages between Jan 14, 2018 and Jan 16, 2018. Diffs are folded; open one to read it.

replies: 4people: 4as markdown or json

randall.s.becker@rogers.com· Jan 14, 2018, 18:07 UTC · lore
From: "Randall S. Becker" <rsbecker@nexbridge.com>
* hashmap.h: Revised the while loop in the hashmap_enable_item_counting
	to remove unneeded void* item.
Signed-off-by: Randall S. Becker <rsbecker@nexbridge.com>
---
 hashmap.h | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
Show changes to hashmap.h +1 −2
diff --git a/hashmap.h b/hashmap.h
index 7ce79f3..d375d9c 100644
--- a/hashmap.h
+++ b/hashmap.h
@@ -400,7 +400,6 @@ static inline void hashmap_disable_item_counting(struct hashmap *map)
  */
 static inline void hashmap_enable_item_counting(struct hashmap *map)
 {
-	void *item;
 	unsigned int n = 0;
 	struct hashmap_iter iter;
 
@@ -408,7 +407,7 @@ static inline void hashmap_enable_item_counting(struct hashmap *map)
 		return;
 
 	hashmap_iter_init(map, &iter);
-	while ((item = hashmap_iter_next(&iter)))
+	while (hashmap_iter_next(&iter))
 		n++;
 
 	map->do_count_items = 1;
-- 
2.8.5.23.g6fa7ec3
Thomas Gummerer· Jan 15, 2018, 20:43 UTC · re: randall.s.becker@rogers.com · lore

Re: [PATCH] Removed unnecessary void* from hashmap.h that caused compile warnings

Thanks for your patch!  A few nitpicks below:
> Subject: [PATCH] Removed unnecessary void* from hashmap.h that caused compile warnings
From Documentation/SubmittingPatches:
    Describe your changes in imperative mood, e.g. "make xyzzy do frotz"
    instead of "[This patch] makes xyzzy do frotz" or "[I] changed xyzzy
    to do frotz", as if you are giving orders to the codebase to change
    its behavior.

I liked the subject Philip suggested in the other thread: "hashmap.h: remove unnecessary void*", or maybe "hashmap.h: remove unnecessary variable".

On 01/14, randall.s.becker@rogers.com wrote:
> From: "Randall S. Becker" <rsbecker@nexbridge.com>
> 
> * hashmap.h: Revised the while loop in the hashmap_enable_item_counting
> 	to remove unneeded void* item.

As above, this should be described in an imperative mood, and describe why this is a good change and should be merged. Maybe something along the lines of the below?

    In 'hashmap_enable_item_counting()', item is assigned but never
    used.  This causes a warning on HP NonStop.  As the variable is
    never used, fix this by just removing it.
Show 29 quoted lines
> Signed-off-by: Randall S. Becker <rsbecker@nexbridge.com>
> ---
>  hashmap.h | 3 +--
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/hashmap.h b/hashmap.h
> index 7ce79f3..d375d9c 100644
> --- a/hashmap.h
> +++ b/hashmap.h
> @@ -400,7 +400,6 @@ static inline void hashmap_disable_item_counting(struct hashmap *map)
>   */
>  static inline void hashmap_enable_item_counting(struct hashmap *map)
>  {
> -	void *item;
>  	unsigned int n = 0;
>  	struct hashmap_iter iter;
>  
> @@ -408,7 +407,7 @@ static inline void hashmap_enable_item_counting(struct hashmap *map)
>  		return;
>  
>  	hashmap_iter_init(map, &iter);
> -	while ((item = hashmap_iter_next(&iter)))
> +	while (hashmap_iter_next(&iter))
>  		n++;
>  
>  	map->do_count_items = 1;
> -- 
> 2.8.5.23.g6fa7ec3
> 
Randall S. Becker· Jan 15, 2018, 20:49 UTC · re: Thomas Gummerer · lore

RE: [PATCH] Removed unnecessary void* from hashmap.h that caused compile warnings

On January 15, 2018 3:43 PM, Thomas Gummerer wrote:
Show 59 quoted lines
> Thanks for your patch!  A few nitpicks below:
> 
> > Subject: [PATCH] Removed unnecessary void* from hashmap.h that caused
> > compile warnings
> 
> From Documentation/SubmittingPatches:
> 
>     Describe your changes in imperative mood, e.g. "make xyzzy do frotz"
>     instead of "[This patch] makes xyzzy do frotz" or "[I] changed xyzzy
>     to do frotz", as if you are giving orders to the codebase to change
>     its behavior.
> 
> I liked the subject Philip suggested in the other thread: "hashmap.h:
> remove unnecessary void*", or maybe "hashmap.h: remove unnecessary
> variable".
> 
> On 01/14, randall.s.becker@rogers.com wrote:
> > From: "Randall S. Becker" <rsbecker@nexbridge.com>
> >
> > * hashmap.h: Revised the while loop in the
> hashmap_enable_item_counting
> > 	to remove unneeded void* item.
> 
> As above, this should be described in an imperative mood, and describe why
> this is a good change and should be merged.  Maybe something along the
> lines of the below?
> 
>     In 'hashmap_enable_item_counting()', item is assigned but never
>     used.  This causes a warning on HP NonStop.  As the variable is
>     never used, fix this by just removing it.
> 
> > Signed-off-by: Randall S. Becker <rsbecker@nexbridge.com>
> > ---
> >  hashmap.h | 3 +--
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/hashmap.h b/hashmap.h
> > index 7ce79f3..d375d9c 100644
> > --- a/hashmap.h
> > +++ b/hashmap.h
> > @@ -400,7 +400,6 @@ static inline void
> hashmap_disable_item_counting(struct hashmap *map)
> >   */
> >  static inline void hashmap_enable_item_counting(struct hashmap *map)
> > {
> > -	void *item;
> >  	unsigned int n = 0;
> >  	struct hashmap_iter iter;
> >
> > @@ -408,7 +407,7 @@ static inline void
> hashmap_enable_item_counting(struct hashmap *map)
> >  		return;
> >
> >  	hashmap_iter_init(map, &iter);
> > -	while ((item = hashmap_iter_next(&iter)))
> > +	while (hashmap_iter_next(&iter))
> >  		n++;
> >
> >  	map->do_count_items = 1;

I like it. Do you need this resubmitted? Or should I just learn for next time?

Cheers, Randall

Thomas Gummerer· Jan 15, 2018, 23:59 UTC · re: Randall S. Becker · lore

Re: [PATCH] Removed unnecessary void* from hashmap.h that caused compile warnings

On 01/15, Randall S. Becker wrote:
Show 38 quoted lines
> On January 15, 2018 3:43 PM, Thomas Gummerer wrote:
> > Thanks for your patch!  A few nitpicks below:
> > 
> > > Subject: [PATCH] Removed unnecessary void* from hashmap.h that caused
> > > compile warnings
> > 
> > From Documentation/SubmittingPatches:
> > 
> >     Describe your changes in imperative mood, e.g. "make xyzzy do frotz"
> >     instead of "[This patch] makes xyzzy do frotz" or "[I] changed xyzzy
> >     to do frotz", as if you are giving orders to the codebase to change
> >     its behavior.
> > 
> > I liked the subject Philip suggested in the other thread: "hashmap.h:
> > remove unnecessary void*", or maybe "hashmap.h: remove unnecessary
> > variable".
> > 
> > On 01/14, randall.s.becker@rogers.com wrote:
> > > From: "Randall S. Becker" <rsbecker@nexbridge.com>
> > >
> > > * hashmap.h: Revised the while loop in the
> > hashmap_enable_item_counting
> > > 	to remove unneeded void* item.
> > 
> > As above, this should be described in an imperative mood, and describe why
> > this is a good change and should be merged.  Maybe something along the
> > lines of the below?
> > 
> >     In 'hashmap_enable_item_counting()', item is assigned but never
> >     used.  This causes a warning on HP NonStop.  As the variable is
> >     never used, fix this by just removing it.
> > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Randall S. Becker <rsbecker@nexbridge.com>
> > >
> > > [..snip..]
> > >
> I like it. Do you need this resubmitted? Or should I just learn for next
> time?

I think it would be good if you resubmit the patch. These rules tend to be applied quite strictly, as you can also see when looking at the git commit history. So with the updated commit message Junio should just be able to pick it up (unless there's something I missed here as well :))

As a side note, I just noticed the two submissions both had [PATCH] in the title, whereas new submissions should be marked as such using [PATCH v2] etc. as prefix, so it's easier for reviewers to know which version is the newer one.

> Cheers,
> Randall
> 
Junio C Hamano· Jan 16, 2018, 22:28 UTC · re: Randall S. Becker · lore

Re: [PATCH] Removed unnecessary void* from hashmap.h that caused compile warnings

"Randall S. Becker" <rsbecker@nexbridge.com> writes:
> I like it. Do you need this resubmitted? Or should I just learn for next
> time?
I'll queue the attached for today's iteration.  Thanks, both.
-- >8 --
From: "Randall S. Becker" <rsbecker@nexbridge.com>
Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2018 13:07:48 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] hashmap.h: remove unused variable

In 'hashmap_enable_item_counting()', item is assigned but never used. This causes a warning on HP NonStop. As the variable is never used, fix this by just removing it.

Signed-off-by: Randall S. Becker <rsbecker@nexbridge.com>
Helped-by: Thomas Gummerer <t.gummerer@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
---
 hashmap.h | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
Show changes to hashmap.h +1 −2
diff --git a/hashmap.h b/hashmap.h
index 7cb29a6aed..c41ce392b7 100644
--- a/hashmap.h
+++ b/hashmap.h
@@ -402,7 +402,6 @@ static inline void hashmap_disable_item_counting(struct hashmap *map)
  */
 static inline void hashmap_enable_item_counting(struct hashmap *map)
 {
-	void *item;
 	unsigned int n = 0;
 	struct hashmap_iter iter;
 
@@ -410,7 +409,7 @@ static inline void hashmap_enable_item_counting(struct hashmap *map)
 		return;
 
 	hashmap_iter_init(map, &iter);
-	while ((item = hashmap_iter_next(&iter)))
+	while (hashmap_iter_next(&iter))
 		n++;
 
 	map->do_count_items = 1;
-- 
2.16.0-rc2-196-ge713b39cb6

← back to recent threads