Re: [PATCH 00/13] Support for arbitrary schemes in credentials
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Mar 24, 2024, 16:13 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqqzfunsj59.fsf@gitster.g>
- In-Reply-To
- <ZgBE37Xs3TQEF2c-@tapette.crustytoothpaste.net>
"brian m. carlson" <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net> writes:
Show 8 quoted lines
>> be, as that is better for the world". But I am OK to add less secure >> thing as long as it is an opt-in "easy way out". > > ... Thus, my goal is to make it _possible_ > for people to implement this, but it to make it their responsibility (or > that of a suitable open source project) to do so instead of asking me to > maintain it. That, I think, is a fair and equitable tradeoff for this > situation.
Yup, I think we are in agreement. I have no problem with giving them a long rope ;-)