Re: [PATCH 1/2] add macro REALLOCARRAY

> Am 16.09.2014 um 05:04 schrieb Junio C Hamano:
>> On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 9:55 AM, René Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de> wrote:
>>> +#define REALLOCARRAY(x, alloc) x = xrealloc((x), (alloc) * sizeof(*(x)))
>>
>> I have been wondering if "x" could be an expression that has an operator
>> that binds weaker than the assignment '='.  That may necessitate the LHS
>> of the assignment to be somehow marked as bound the tightest, i.e.
>>
>> #define REALLOC_ARRAY(x, alloc) (x) = xrealloc((x), (alloc) * sizeof(*(x)))
>>
>> Or am I being overly silly?
>
> ALLOC_GROW did well without that.  I can't think of a good use case
> for a complex expression on the right-hand side.  That said, I think I
> still have a spare matching pair of parentheses lying around here
> somewhere, so let's play it safe and use them. :)