Re: [PATCH 00/11] git worktree (re)move
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Nov 16, 2016, 18:11 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqqy40jqoqm.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20161116130533.GA5393@ash>
Duy Nguyen <pclouds@gmail.com> writes:
> The following patch should fix it if that's the same thing you saw. I > could pile it on worktree-move series, or you can make it a separate > one-patch series. What's your preference?
Giving a stable output to the users is probably a good preparatory fix to what is already in the released versions, so it would make the most sense to make it a separate patch to be applied to maint then build the remainder on top.
I do not think "always show the primary first" is necessarily a good idea (I would have expected an output more like "git branch --list").