Re: Simplify-by-decoration with decorate-refs-exclude
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Aug 3, 2019, 14:44 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqqwofuia0x.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <64bc5556-b098-7991-b7c2-3483277bb73c@web.de>
René Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de> writes:
> Sure, but we'd need to move the code to handle the raw format as well, no? > Perhaps like this? It depends on callers of parse_revision_opt() calling > setup_revisions() before using decorations. And it may have other side > effects; I'm not comfortable with this change.
Hmph, fair enough. I missed the fact that we do want to keep "--pretty=raw" being "special" but only in "log"; a move in this direction teaches the revision walk API layer about it, which is probably not a good idea.
Thanks for sanity checking.