Re: [PATCH] branch: let '--edit-description' default to rebased branch during rebase
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Feb 7, 2020, 19:12 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqqwo8y2ovu.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <CAJ+F1C+qGo=6QrRw2299Apr2+-CHNWQyzWjvWbXJN5KC+T63AQ@mail.gmail.com>
Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@gmail.com> writes:
Show 20 quoted lines
> Hi > > On Fri, Feb 7, 2020 at 7:57 PM Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote: >> >> Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@gmail.com> writes: >> >> > Also, when doing --edit-description there are comments like: >> > >> > # Please edit the description for the branch >> > # unrelated-history >> > >> > What else do you suggest? >> >> How about teaching "git branch --edit-description [HEAD]" notice >> when/if HEAD is detached and always error out, no matter what >> operation is in progress? > > Then --edit-description during won't default to the branch you started > from the bisect. So we are back to my original proposal only, having > branch default during rebase. Eric, do you mind?
What I meant by "no matter what is in progress" is not to special case "during rebase", either.
Sorry for the confusion.