Re: [PATCH] branch: let '--edit-description' default to rebased branch during rebase
- From
Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@gmail.com>
- Date
- Feb 7, 2020, 19:09 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CAJ+F1C+qGo=6QrRw2299Apr2+-CHNWQyzWjvWbXJN5KC+T63AQ@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <xmqq1rr6444s.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com>
Hi
On Fri, Feb 7, 2020 at 7:57 PM Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
Show 13 quoted lines
> > Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@gmail.com> writes: > > > Also, when doing --edit-description there are comments like: > > > > # Please edit the description for the branch > > # unrelated-history > > > > What else do you suggest? > > How about teaching "git branch --edit-description [HEAD]" notice > when/if HEAD is detached and always error out, no matter what > operation is in progress?
Then --edit-description during won't default to the branch you started from the bisect. So we are back to my original proposal only, having branch default during rebase. Eric, do you mind?
-- Marc-André Lureau