Re: [PATCH] t1400: fix --no-create-reflog test and description

From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Nov 8, 2024, 03:13 UTC
Message-ID: <xmqqwmhepgcw.fsf@gitster.g>
In-Reply-To: <4e68a04f-fb5e-49f9-8ba2-661027d8165d@app.fastmail.com>

"Kristoffer Haugsbakk" <code@khaugsbakk.name> writes:

> I didn’t get the impression that this is expecting a reroll.  But I
> haven’t seen it mentioned or applied to `seen`/`next`?

If the interim maintainer did not think it is ready to be queued to 'seen', I won't go back to the list archive to pick it up (after all, that is part of trusting interim maintainer is about---otherwise I have to go back and consume all the list backlog, which does not make sense).

If a topic is worth resurrecting, do resend it for discussion. Looking at the archived discussion (for this topic I am making an exception), I did not get an impression that this got a "yeah this is a good thing to do" support, only a lukewarm "it may be a starting point in a good direction".

Thanks.