From: Junio C Hamano Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2024 03:13:51 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH] t1400: fix --no-create-reflog test and description Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <4e68a04f-fb5e-49f9-8ba2-661027d8165d@app.fastmail.com> "Kristoffer Haugsbakk" writes: > I didn’t get the impression that this is expecting a reroll. But I > haven’t seen it mentioned or applied to `seen`/`next`? If the interim maintainer did not think it is ready to be queued to 'seen', I won't go back to the list archive to pick it up (after all, that is part of trusting interim maintainer is about---otherwise I have to go back and consume all the list backlog, which does not make sense). If a topic is worth resurrecting, do resend it for discussion. Looking at the archived discussion (for this topic I am making an exception), I did not get an impression that this got a "yeah this is a good thing to do" support, only a lukewarm "it may be a starting point in a good direction". Thanks.