Re: [PATCH 3/3] make: delete REFTABLE_LIB, add reftable to LIB_OBJS

From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Oct 2, 2025, 13:32 UTC
Message-ID: <xmqqwm5dxwdk.fsf@gitster.g>
In-Reply-To: <aN4SU3lLFi2EROsF@pks.im>

Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im> writes:

Show 20 quoted lines

> On Wed, Oct 01, 2025 at 06:02:28PM +0000, Ezekiel Newren via GitGitGadget wrote:
>> diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
>> index d89ba03286..4c63045443 100644
>> --- a/Makefile
>> +++ b/Makefile
>> @@ -1411,9 +1410,9 @@ REFTABLE_OBJS += reftable/system.o
>>  REFTABLE_OBJS += reftable/table.o
>>  REFTABLE_OBJS += reftable/tree.o
>>  REFTABLE_OBJS += reftable/writer.o
>> +LIB_OBJS += $(REFTABLE_OBJS)
>>  
>> -# reftable lib may in turn depend on what is in libgit.a
>> -GITLIBS = common-main.o $(LIB_FILE) $(REFTABLE_LIB) $(LIB_FILE)
>> +GITLIBS = common-main.o $(LIB_FILE)
>>  EXTLIBS =
>>  
>>  GIT_USER_AGENT = git/$(GIT_VERSION)
>
> Same question here as on the preceding commit: do we even need
> REFTABLE_OBJS anymore?

Same answer as before.

> Other than that these patches look sensible to me, thanks. Even without
> Rust they simplify our build infra a bit, so I think that landing them
> independently of Rust is a good thing.

Thanks.