Re: Re* [PATCH v4] userdiff: improve java hunk header regex
Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org> writes:
Show 8 quoted lines
>> + * When writing or updating patterns, assume that the contents these
>> + * patterns are applied to are syntactically correct. You do not have
>> + * to implement all syntactical corner cases---the patterns have to be
>> + * sufficiently permissive.
>> + */
>
> IMO, as written, the comment falls short of suggesting that patterns can
> be simple. How about appending "and can be simple"?
The patterns can be simple without implementing all syntactical
corner cases, as long as they are sufficiently permissive.perhaps?
Thanks.