Re: Re* [PATCH v4] userdiff: improve java hunk header regex

> Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org> writes:
> 
>>> + * When writing or updating patterns, assume that the contents these
>>> + * patterns are applied to are syntactically correct.  You do not have
>>> + * to implement all syntactical corner cases---the patterns have to be
>>> + * sufficiently permissive.
>>> + */
>>
>> IMO, as written, the comment falls short of suggesting that patterns can
>> be simple. How about appending "and can be simple"?
> 
>     The patterns can be simple without implementing all syntactical
>     corner cases, as long as they are sufficiently permissive.
> 
> perhaps?