git/list[1] front-page[2] threads[3] people[4] search[5] about
 

Re: [PATCH 1/5] doc: glossary: add root ref and clarify pseudorefs

From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date
Oct 22, 2026, 22:07 UTC
Message-ID
<xmqqv76tcrtb.fsf@gitster.g>
In-Reply-To
<20261022212903.177261-2-andy.koppe@gmail.com>
Andy Koppe <andy.koppe@gmail.com> writes:
Show 36 quoted lines
> The glossary describes refs in the root of the ref hierarchy, but does
> not actually name them "root refs", even though the term is used
> elsewhere, for example by "git for-each-ref --include-root-refs". It
> also defines pseudorefs as refs, yet is_root_ref() deliberately excludes
> them, as they are not stored or handled by the ref backends.
>
> Add a "root ref" entry, moving the naming rules and the list of
> irregular root refs there from the "ref" entry. State that pseudorefs
> are not root refs, and refer to gitrevisions(7) for descriptions of
> commonly used root refs and pseudorefs.
>
> Reword the "pseudoref" entry so that it no longer calls them refs, add
> git-for-each-ref(1) as another example of how they are not proper refs,
> and explain that using a pseudoref containing multiple object IDs yields
> the first one.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andy Koppe <andy.koppe@gmail.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/glossary-content.adoc | 68 +++++++++++++++++------------
>  1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/glossary-content.adoc b/Documentation/glossary-content.adoc
> index 52301a56dd..b2c582254b 100644
> --- a/Documentation/glossary-content.adoc
> +++ b/Documentation/glossary-content.adoc
> @@ -500,9 +500,10 @@ exclude;;
>  	unusual refs.
>  
>  [[def_pseudoref]]pseudoref::
> -	A ref that has different semantics than normal refs. These refs can be
> -	read via normal Git commands, but cannot be written to by commands like
> -	linkgit:git-update-ref[1].
> +	A name that can be used like a <<def_ref,ref>> to refer to
> +	<<def_object,objects>>, but that is not stored in the same way as refs.
> +	For example, pseudorefs cannot be written by linkgit:git-update-ref[1]
> +	or listed by linkgit:git-for-each-ref[1].

I would love to get input from Patrick who wrote 993d57eded (refs: pseudorefs are no refs, 2024-05-15), as I consider that the loss of "different semantics" from this description is a rather serious one. FETCH_HEAD and MERGE_HEAD cannot be written with update-ref simply because it is normal for them to record multiple object names, so it is not just "how" they are stored, but also "what" they can store, that makes them "strange", "pseudo", "different", and "special".

Show 9 quoted lines
>  The following pseudorefs are known to Git:
>  
> @@ -512,6 +513,9 @@ The following pseudorefs are known to Git:
>  
>   - `MERGE_HEAD` is written by linkgit:git-merge[1] when resolving merge
>     conflicts. It contains all commit IDs which are being merged.
> ++
> +When a pseudoref contains more than one object ID, using it to refer to an
> +object yields the first one.
This is an important addition.
Show 48 quoted lines
> @@ -562,33 +566,12 @@ The following pseudorefs are known to Git:
>  +
>  The ref namespace is hierarchical.
>  Ref names must either start with `refs/` or be located in the root of
> +the hierarchy, in which case they must follow the naming rules for
> +<<def_root_ref,root refs>>.
>  +
>  Different subhierarchies are used for different purposes. For example,
>  the `refs/heads/` hierarchy is used to represent local branches whereas
> -the `refs/tags/` hierarchy is used to represent local tags..
> +the `refs/tags/` hierarchy is used to represent local tags.
>  +
>  See also "REFERENCES" in linkgit:gitdatamodel[7].
>  
> @@ -640,6 +623,37 @@ format. See linkgit:git-reflog[1] for details.
>  	To throw away part of the development, i.e. to assign the
>  	<<def_head,head>> to an earlier <<def_revision,revision>>.
>  
> +[[def_root_ref]]root ref::
> +	A <<def_ref,ref>> located in the root of the ref hierarchy, outside
> +	`refs/`. Root ref names must follow these rules:
> ++
> +--
> + - The name consists of only upper-case characters or underscores.
> +
> + - The name ends with "`_HEAD`" or is equal to "`HEAD`".
> +--
> ++
> +The following irregular root refs are exceptions to these rules. This
> +list is exhaustive and shall not be extended in future:
> ++
> +--
> + - `AUTO_MERGE`
> +
> + - `BISECT_EXPECTED_REV`
> +
> + - `NOTES_MERGE_PARTIAL`
> +
> + - `NOTES_MERGE_REF`
> +
> + - `MERGE_AUTOSTASH`
> +--
> ++
> +<<def_pseudoref,Pseudorefs>> are not considered root refs, even though
> +they follow the naming rules.
> ++
> +See linkgit:gitrevisions[7] for descriptions of commonly used root refs
> +and pseudorefs.

I think this is a great reorganization to split out the "these are exceptions" into its own section.

Previous: Andy KoppeNext: Patrick Steinhardt
Message 3 of 13 in “root refs vs pseudorefs”
  1. 0/5 root refs vs pseudorefsAndy Koppe, Oct 22, 2026
  2. 1/5 doc: glossary: add root ref and clarify pseudorefsAndy Koppe, Oct 22, 2026
  3. Junio C HamanoOct 22, 2026
  4. Patrick SteinhardtOct 23, 2026
  5. 2/5 doc: glossary: update per-worktree refsAndy Koppe, Oct 22, 2026
  6. Patrick SteinhardtOct 23, 2026
  7. 3/5 doc: stop calling root refs pseudorefsAndy Koppe, Oct 22, 2026
  8. Patrick SteinhardtOct 23, 2026
  9. 4/5 refs: stop calling root refs pseudorefsAndy Koppe, Oct 22, 2026
  10. Patrick SteinhardtOct 23, 2026
  11. 5/5 t: stop calling root refs pseudorefsAndy Koppe, Oct 22, 2026
  12. Junio C HamanoOct 22, 2026
  13. Julia EvansOct 23, 2026

Read the whole thread, see it on lore, or plain text.

$ cat FOOTERMessages come from the public archive at lore.kernel.org/git, fetched every hour. The front page is chosen and written each morning by an AI editor and can be wrong; the threads themselves are the record. About and API. For agents: an MCP server at https://gitlist.dev/mcp, and any thread, story or person page as Markdown by adding .md to its URL (or sending Accept: text/markdown). Details in /llms.txt.