Re: [PATCH 08/31] refs.c: only write reflog update if msg is non-NULL
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- May 16, 2014, 21:24 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqqtx8p8lj2.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <1400105610-21194-9-git-send-email-sahlberg@google.com>
Ronnie Sahlberg <sahlberg@google.com> writes:
Show 26 quoted lines
> When performing a reflog transaction update, only write to the reflog iff
> msg is non-NULL. This can then be combined with REFLOG_TRUNCATE to perform
> an update that only truncates but does not write.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ronnie Sahlberg <sahlberg@google.com>
> ---
> refs.c | 8 +++++---
> refs.h | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/refs.c b/refs.c
> index a8b583a..a3f60ad 100644
> --- a/refs.c
> +++ b/refs.c
> @@ -3625,9 +3625,11 @@ int transaction_commit(struct ref_transaction *transaction,
> ftruncate(update->reflog_fd, 0)) {
> error("Could not truncate reflog");
> }
> - if (log_ref_write_fd(update->reflog_fd, update->old_sha1,
> - update->new_sha1,
> - update->committer, update->msg)) {
> + if (update->msg && log_ref_write_fd(update->reflog_fd,
> + update->old_sha1,
> + update->new_sha1,
> + update->committer,
> + update->msg)) {Wouldn't it make it easier to read if you chopped immediately after the &&, i.e. chopping at a gap at a higher-level in the parse tree?
if (update->msg &&
log_ref_write_fd(update->reflog_fd,
update->old_sha1, update->old_sha1,
update->committer, update->msg)) {