Re: [PATCH 08/31] refs.c: only write reflog update if msg is non-NULL
- From
Ronnie Sahlberg <sahlberg@google.com>
- Date
- May 19, 2014, 22:55 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CAL=YDWm3N28jMmdWwWLrseK9bG0kwAmYDZ6+yRoa8cfA3S_kxQ@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <xmqqtx8p8lj2.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com>
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 2:24 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
Show 31 quoted lines
> Ronnie Sahlberg <sahlberg@google.com> writes:
>
>> When performing a reflog transaction update, only write to the reflog iff
>> msg is non-NULL. This can then be combined with REFLOG_TRUNCATE to perform
>> an update that only truncates but does not write.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ronnie Sahlberg <sahlberg@google.com>
>> ---
>> refs.c | 8 +++++---
>> refs.h | 1 +
>> 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/refs.c b/refs.c
>> index a8b583a..a3f60ad 100644
>> --- a/refs.c
>> +++ b/refs.c
>> @@ -3625,9 +3625,11 @@ int transaction_commit(struct ref_transaction *transaction,
>> ftruncate(update->reflog_fd, 0)) {
>> error("Could not truncate reflog");
>> }
>> - if (log_ref_write_fd(update->reflog_fd, update->old_sha1,
>> - update->new_sha1,
>> - update->committer, update->msg)) {
>> + if (update->msg && log_ref_write_fd(update->reflog_fd,
>> + update->old_sha1,
>> + update->new_sha1,
>> + update->committer,
>> + update->msg)) {
>
> Wouldn't it make it easier to read if you chopped immediately after
> the &&, i.e. chopping at a gap at a higher-level in the parse tree?Yepp it does. Changed. Thanks.
Show 5 quoted lines
>
> if (update->msg &&
> log_ref_write_fd(update->reflog_fd,
> update->old_sha1, update->old_sha1,
> update->committer, update->msg)) {